Categories
Calendar
<<  March 2010  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

What’s the most important issue today? The death of Michael Jackson? No, it’s more of an distraction. Most probably the economy, your health or family still matter most to you. You got distracted anyways. Last week another issue was more important than anything else it seemed. It was the election in Iran or rather the ensuing backlash.

Now I don’t mean to say that the Iranian election wasn’t important. It was perhaps one of the more important issues lately compared to the misguided swine flu craze or todays celebrity death.

What’s more striking is that the US government was keen to make the point that the Iran issue was so important that it asked Twitter to postpone its scheduled maintenance.

So the US state department obviously recognized that Twitter was crucial to its interests in Iran. This was really news because usually we don’t hear much about direct government involvement in making news or getting the news heard the government prefers. It happens all the time but in most cases behind the scenes.

What does it tell us about Twitter as of today:

  • Twitter has become a crucial mass medium
  • Governments make sure their voice gets heard on and via Twitter
  • Twitter has the power to distract
  • Twitter can make the world population focus on one single issue at a time
  • Twitter is the first truly globalized medium

Twitter also is a so called “weapon of mass distraction”

Remember? In recent years we were mostly told that Iran is

  • evil (hates Jews, women and gays)
  • dangerous
  • “a regime” rules there.

Also Iran allegedly develops nuclear weapons (weapons of mass destruction). The US was always short of invading Iran.

Not only the US government cares for Twitter. Iranian government agents have been reported to use Twitter to spread misinformation as well. So you see that Twitter is not really a medium you can trust to be impartial.

Single tweets and whole trends can be be entirely fake or meant to distract you.

We have seen the swine flu panic spread virally unlike the virus itself that took weeks or months to spread and until now it was less deadly than most average seasonal flu viruses.

So there is a striking misrepresentation spreading via Twitter. How can you deal with that? Stop using twitter altogether? Well, no. You won’t stop reading newspapers or watching TV either inspite of them spreading lies repeatedly as well. Like with all mass media you can’t trust them. Unlike with old media like newspapers and TV though here we have a way to determine directly what’s true and what not by relying on personal networks.

Listen to the people you know already.

I knew some bloggers and social media users from Iran before the recent elections so I could ask them. I didn’t trust the hastily made up accounts all in green, all in English with almost the same avatars everywhere (in English as well).

Former president Bush readily acknowledged years ago that the US is engaging in infiltration and sabotage inside Iran. So basically you never now what’s going on out there unless you find a person you can trust. Robert Fisk is a journalist who is an expert on the Middle East for decades by now and he went to Iran himself.

No what the hell does it mean for Twitter, marketing and business? Well, you can read tons of business, marketing and SEO advice on Twitter but can you really trust it?

  • Anonymous SEO experts with names like “SEOsomething”?
  • Kevin Rose of Digg who banned SEO there and now advises you how to artificially inflate your umber of followers on Twitter?
  • SEO celebrities with 30k followers?

I don’t think so. You need people you really trust. You only know you can trust someone when you communicate with that person.

© SEOptimise - Search Engine Marketing & Search Engine Optimisation. Follow SEOptimise on Twitter!

Twitter Friday: Twitter as a Weapon of Mass Distraction

Related posts:

  1. Twitter Friday: Dell is Making Millions on Twitter but What Else?
  2. Twitter Friday: Twitter Search is Broken
  3. Twitter Friday: Digg, Reddit or Mixx? Twitter!

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Local business success story Naked Pizza

The most obvious trend when it comes to SEO is “going local”. Ever since Google introduced Google Maps and Local Business Center and later added local search results to Universal Search displaying them on top of everything else businesses everywhere strive to be there. Additionally the proliferation of smartphones and netbooks accelerates this development even more.

You have to perform in local search and on sites that enable users to find local businesses in their respective area. Classic SEO is just not enough anymore for small business owners and location based big business.

There is already a plethora of very helpful resources that deal with local SEO. While to some extent local SEO resembles traditional SEO with on site measures and link building the substantial differences have even led to a specialization in the industry.

By now we have SEO specialists and publications predominantly dealing with local search issues and local SEO.

Thus I complied a list of the most useful resources, mostly from blogs: 44 local SEO & search resources for business.

Why do I add the seemingly obvious “for business” part in the headline? In most cases you won’t optimize your private homepage to be found in a specific area. Local search is a mostly business only domain.

Local SEO & Search Blogs

Local SEO Overviews for Starters and Lists

Local Search Ranking Factors

Local SEO Techniques

Local SEO Internationally

Local SEO Case Studies

Local SEO Experts

Local Search Terms

Initially I planned to compile a list of both local and mobile SEO resources due to their obvious correlation. After some research the sheer amount of must read resources for local SEO & search outgrew the combined list quickly. Thus I will publish a new list in 2 weeks from now: 30 Mobile SEO Resources.

As always this list doesn’t claim to be complete.
So you’re welcome to add your links or resources you are missing in the comment section. You can also add mobile SEO articles for the next list post to be incuded.

© SEOptimise - Search Engine Marketing & Search Engine Optimisation. Follow SEOptimise on Twitter!

44 Local SEO & Search Resources for Business

Related posts:

  1. 30+ More Non-Google SEO “How to” Online Marketing Resources for 2009
  2. Graywolf local search interviews
  3. 78 Essential Search Engine Marketing & SEO Resources!

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Google are now including a 4th match type in their search query reports: “Broad Match (Session Based)”. I think it is great to have some reporting about the search history issue so I quickly got to work to see how this match type performed.

A Broad Toad by Pixieslayer on Flickr

A Broad Toad by Pixieslayer on Flickr

I ran a search query report for one of our accounts and then I compared “Broad Match” with “Broad Match (Session Based). Here are my results:

  • Just under 2% of all broad match queries were session based. As speculated in my last post I think this number will depend a lot on your vertical and how much you bid per click.
  • Click through rates for session based broad match are ridiculously high. For the account I tested the average CTR is 64%! This illustrates the importance of having an advert that is different from the competition.
  • The average cost per click is about 10% higher. I think this will be another thing that varies quite a lot depending on the account. For the account I checked the average CPC is normally very close to the CPC bid; I think the cost per click for Session Based Broad Match would be propotionally higher if you have a larger gap between average CPC and max CPC.
  • The conversion rate is 14% lower. O’ dear. And I was going to say that things weren’t as bad as I thought.
  • Because of the higher CPC and the lower conversion rate the cost per conversion is nearly 30% higher. Cost per conversion is a major KPI for this account. For standard broad match keywords it is just under the target figure. For session based broad match it is well over.

Hello, Google? Richard Fergie here. Can I have my account back?

© SEOptimise - Search Engine Marketing & Search Engine Optimisation. Follow SEOptimise on Twitter!

Google AdWords Session Based Broad Match?

Related posts:

  1. Google Analytics Tip - How to Find All AdWords Search Queries Triggered from Phrase/Broad Matches
  2. Google AdWords regionalised ad text experiment
  3. Google AdWords Conversion Optimiser launched in beta

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks to everyone who took part in last week’s is social media future proof online poll, we received a great response and the results are now in!

We have published all results below, along with any comments and our own conclusions for each question. If you are reading this in an RSS reader or email please click through to view online.

Question 1) Which social media website is most likely to still be around in 2020?

Comments:

  • NikkiPilkington: No reason why they won’t all still be around, just hopefully in advanced forms.
  • Zigmas: I suppose that the most professional social networks will live.
  • heidiboesdal: I don’t think any of these will be around in 2020
  • maverickny: I don’t think any of them will be around as a force. Most online trends last 5 yrs or so - look at Usenet, AOL and Yahoo as examples.

So what does this tell us?

Well firstly this predicts that Facebook, YouTube and LinkedIn are the most likely social media websites to still be around in 2020. Based on this Twitter and Flickr still have a reasonably good chance of still being around too, while Digg only received one vote and no-one voted for MySpace. This was shortly followed by MySpace’s announcement to cut staff by a third, they should read SEOptimise - we saw it coming! :)

Question 2) In 2020 will social media be more important than search as a marketing channel?

Comments:

  • Tad Chef: There is no answer to this question. By 2020 search and social will be one. You won’t even talk about social search. Search will always be social and this will be self-evident. People won’t understand that there was a time where search was solely determined by bots and not the wisdom of crowds.
  • John I voted for NO - because its still 11 years away and at the speed the net is evolving - there will be new methods, platforms for online marketing. Not very long ago - e-mail marketing was hot - but now its a thing of almost history. So is social media today - the hottest technique. But there will be newer platforms in the next few years time.
  • NikkiPilkington: It will be ‘differently important’ as it’s more about developing and keeping relationships alive.

So what does this tell us?

This poll had a mixed response, but it strongly suggests that social media does, and will continue to, play a major role as a marketing channel. Many people suggested by 2020 that search and social media may have merged, this could well be true and Twitter already appears to be heading in this direction by crawling links left in tweets and indexing external URLs. Although there’s certainly a lot of work which needs to be done to achieve this and become a major competitor to Google, it may take until 2020 to grab a significant slice of search market share!

Question 3) Which channels do you expect to deliver most new business leads in 2010?

Comments:

  • NikkiPilkington: Search Marketing & Social Media will generate the most, but different types of leads with different needs I think

So what does this tell us?

The third question delivered a very interesting response, with search marketing overwhelmingly expected to deliver the most leads in 2010. Plus social media was still almost twice as popular as traditional marketing which received just 14% of votes. I would agree with these results, the quality of targeted traffic from the search engines makes this incredibly valuable in terms of converting into online sales and social media has become a very powerful tool in terms of indirectly advertising a site via quality content in order to build brand awareness and generate future sales.

Question 4) What are the main goals of your social media marketing campaigns?

Comments:

  • WebTalentSEO: brand awareness/traffic generation for me
  • Carl: Gaining new customers
  • NikkiPilkington: All of the above :)

So what does this tell us?

Question four asked what are your main goals in a social media campaign? In many cases there are likely to be several of these goals at the same time, but the results showed that the most popular objective is to build brand awareness/generate traffic and to build/manage relationships. Again I would agree with this outcome, the main goal of a social media campaign in my experience is rarely direct sales. The real value is in building brand awareness and a well-respected reputation. When connecting with an industry online, perhaps using Twitter, it’s important that you contribute and interact with users to manage and build the relationships you’ve built. Another goal could be from an SEO perspecive, in an attempt to target bloggers, media or key influencers via linkbait.

Question 5) By 2020 will social media networking replace email use?

Comments:

  • Ben Werdmuller: This might very well happen, but the chances of social media looking the same as it does now are nil (whereas email’s been around for decades and isn’t likely to change much).
  • Tad Chef: Email is dead already for a few years. Younger people don’t even bother unless they have to, they prefer IM etc.
  • MDiesel: Email “dead”? Not a chance. They said that about snail mail and as far as I see, snail mail still has its place. Businesses rely heavily on email to email docs, images, invoices, etc. No business is going to transfer their classified document on FB, LinkedIn, etc. And a lot of businesses still prefer face to face communication and phone use. For personal use, maybe social media will be the primary method of transferring messages but this is a separate world that is very small compared to non-personal use. BTW, email started in the business world decades before it hit the personal world.
  • Rich Kirk: I think Google Wave & derivatives/impersonators will replace email gradually due to its superb functionality for project management and through the ways in which it will incorporate elements of IM and social networking through apps etc. Nothing will kill email, however, we’ll just see the continuing divergence of communications channels, and a waning in the dominance of particular channels. I think we’ve already started to see this.

So what does this tell us?

Finally, will social media replace email? Social media is now taking a larger percentage of internet usage than email, but the response is still very mixed here. 46% think email will be replaced, but 54% think it will still be around in 2020. I would agree with Tad’s comment that the younger generation are more likely to use instant messaging, Facebook wall/message posts, Twitter etc and I would expect email to be less frequently used in the future. But I’m not so sure if email could ever be completely replaced. Professionally I think it would be very difficult to communicate with clients online without the use of email, but it will be very interesting to see how the launch of Google Wave affects this.

Thanks again to everyone who took part and please feel free to leave your own thoughts and conclusions in the comments below.

© SEOptimise - Search Engine Marketing & Search Engine Optimisation. Follow SEOptimise on Twitter!

Is Social Media Future Proof? Here’s the Verdict!

Related posts:

  1. Is Social Media Future Proof? Online Poll Series - Part 1
  2. In 2020 will social media be more important than search as a marketing channel?
  3. By 2020 will social media networking replace email use?

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Let’s face it 404 pages are a pain, for webmasters and for users. I absolutely hate clicking on a link and getting a 404 error page. However, what’s really our concern here is what it does for your SEO. What should you do about those 404 pages? Should you just leave it alone or should you 301 redirect all of them? As usual moderation and common sense is the answer to this dilemma. Randfish recently gave his opinion on when to redirect the 404 pages an when to just leave them alone.

Basically what he said was to just leave all 404 pages alone unless the page:

A) Receives important links to it from external sources,
B) Is receiving a substantive quantity of visitor traffic,
and/or C) Has an obvious URL that visitors/links intended to reach.

In short unless you can see that you’re really losing on substantial link juice then let it be. From the user stand point though I have to agree with Yoshimi that 301s can actually be more confusing to searchers then 404s. 404s are irritating but it is even more irritating to click on a link and be baffled when you end up back on the site’s homepage. At least a 404 page makes you realise that there’s a problem somewhere along the way and that you’re not just being crazy clicking again and again and encountering the same frustrating problem of ending nowhere you want to be. Of course, as Randfish says if it’s obvious that the URL was misspelled then a 301 redirect to the desired URL won’t be confusing at all.

To make 404 pages less irritating and baffling what you can do is to customise your 404 page. Jeff Atwood’s post on Creating User Friendly 404 Pages is a useful guide on how to do this. Remember though that a customised 404 page will not affect your SEO but anything that will make things better for your users is always good for your end goal.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Before I begin, I have a confession to make: I got the idea for this piece from Oprah magazine. That being said, if you choose to continue to read, thank you.

Just in time marketing means understanding that you need to have an arsenal of techniques with which to react to changes, whether they’re in an engine’s algorithm or your seasonal business needs. It means that you aren’t actively holding onto anything that makes your marketing more cumbersome or cluttered, that you simply are able to adapt readily when necessary. This is like having a savings account that you aren’t using. It’s nice to know that, if you need it, you can access it. Just in time marketing means spending time reading, learning about what works and what doesn’t, and just generally staying informed so that you can react in a timely and appropriate manner. In case you care, just in time marketing has its roots in the Japanese factory industry. Instead of filling up their warehouses with parts needed, they’d simply order them just in time and save on storage. I may be oversimplifying but it’s not really a difficult concept to grasp.

It’s much less stressful than just in case marketing, where you continue to do things like spend $5000 a month on a banner ad that was good 2 years ago, isn’t doing much for you right now, but one day soon it might again. Yes, I know that the banner ad is enjoying a renaissance but I’m talking about the OLD banner ads, thanks. This is usually done by people who hang on to jeans that are 2 sizes too small in hopes that one day they’ll fit again. I don’t do that, for the record. I DO keep the ones that are 1 size too small though. Just in case marketing can tie up loads of your budget, and occupy your mind with things that aren’t going on RIGHT NOW. Even if you aren’t spending money actively, if you have to look at a PPC account for 50 keyphrases that you’re marketing that get zero traffic and maybe 5 total impressions per month, you’re spending time and effort that could be put to better use elsewhere. I say all this with complete respect, of course, as I tend to carry around an emergency string cheese wherever I go and I am rarely in an area with restricted cheese access.

stringcheese

Just in case marketing does have its place here, of course, but if you’ve done the basic SEO on a site, you’ve probably handled a lot of it already. The point of just in time marketing is the freedom that it gives you. If you’re not being pulled in a billion different useless directions, you’re more efficient with what you do need to be doing. As mentioned above, time spent monitoring something that isn’t productive for your needs is time taken away from something that could bring you more visibility. Instead of continuing to hope that someone searches for (insert obscure long-tailed keyphrase here), why not try and find some new keyphrases that will produce? I feel like one of those people who writes the “want to eat this, how about trying this instead, as it has half the fat?” articles now.

Obviously you’d not want to go to either of these extremes, as they each have their downsides. However, maybe if we spent a bit more time in the “just in time” mindset, we’d all be a lot more productive.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5